Breakthrough Briefing   Questions?  416-238-3297  1-800-ECAMPUS
 
Sign Up Now!

Subscribe to our FREE email newsletter!

Name:
Email:
 
Meet a Client
Meet the Guys
Breakthrough Briefing is your one-stop source to valuable information on how to make your eLearning more effective. Within this publication we address what it takes to make breakthroughs in eLearning at an organizational level and individually in your eLearning careers.

Breakthrough Briefing - 08/11/06

Doing vs. Knowing
 
By Rick Nigol

We ran our most subscribed webinar ever yesterday. Sixty-two participants from a variety of sectors (financial services, health care, pharmaceutical, food, telecom, retail, energy, education, entertainment, legal, etc.) participated in our session on Using Simulations to Bring Your eLearning to Life. We obviously struck a chord, as it appears that gaming and simulations are getting a lot of attention these days as methods for making education and training more engaging.
 
When we polled participants on whether they had ever experienced a training simulation, we were pleasantly surprised that most respondents had done so. However, when we asked what that experience was like, not surprisingly, the results were mixed. The eLearning field is still in the early days of figuring out how to make the most of simulations.
 
We were fortunate to have James Chisholm from ExperiencePoint as a special guest at yesterday's webinar. He provided some great insight on what makes simulations work and we took a tour through a simulation on change management that his company has produced.
 
Here are some highlights:
  • Simulations are about placing the learner at the centre of a realistic situation or scenario, having them assess the situation, making decisions on courses of action, and getting immediate feedback on the quality of those decisions.
  • Too much of training today is focused on "knowing" things. Simulations provide opportunities to "do" things. Doing things is focused on applying new knowledge, which encourages deeper, internalized learning, and changed behaviour.
  • Simulations do not always have to be conducted online and individually. There are great opportunities to do simulations in blended learning formats, either by doing them in group settings and/or debriefing as a group.
When we asked participants for their main "take aways" from the session, two themes emerged.

1) Make the decisions within simulations challenging, so as not to obviously guide learners to the right answers (i.e. let them screw up once in a while...a lot can be learned from making mistakes in a safe environment).

2) A simulation does not have to be huge and complicated. You can contain it to a specific task or situation that can be developed fairly quickly and economically.
 
Here is a link to the recording of this webinar.
 
And keep an eye open for our Fall 2006 series of webinars, which will focus on various ways of using eLearning to support and enhance organizational performance.

Rick Nigol is Director of Education for eLearn Campus. Read about his background in eLearning and how he can help you make your eLearning better.  You may leave a comment about this article or send an email to rick@elearncampus.com.


Recorded Webinars:

eBriefing:
The Special Challenges for Learning Organizations:
Ongoing Management and Evaluation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By Michael Grant
Co-Founder and Director of Research
eLearn Campus
 
Last week, I discussed a key element of doing, namely capacity development for eLearning.  This week I want to discuss some of the ongoing management challenges you may face when implementing eLearning and review some of the ways you can determine whether your initiative is adding value.
 
Assuming that you have been successful in developing your eLearning program, there are a few management challenges that you may need to address along the way.  I will run through some of these in the order that you may encounter them.
 
Poor Marketing
We have worked with organizations that have done a great job of designing a course and an absolutely horrible job of telling anyone about it.  I would put this into the general category of eLearning marketing.  Good marketers understand that they have to design a course that addresses a specific need.  But even the best course will not be attended if no one knows about it. 
 
When it comes to online learning, this is not just about advertising or promotion.  You have to know where your learners are coming from in terms of their past learning experiences.  It helps to emphasis the flexible and interactive nature of online learning, especially these days when many people are experiencing time management challenges. 

Even if your learners have the technical wherewithal to access an online course, they may need you to “hand hold” them through the process for the first time.  Anything that you can do to make the whole experience as enjoyable and pain free as possible will help you in the short and long run.
 
(In)Completion Rates
Even if you are successful at marketing your course, you need to think about how to keep the learners in your program through to completion.  Certainly engaging design (both in the pedagogical and graphical senses) plays a very important role.  But it is also important to provide a lot of support through the process, especially for first time learners.  One element is learner support through an experienced online facilitator.  But it also helps to have ongoing technical support, particularly in the early stages.
 
Completion rates are often related to the motivation to learn.  We have found in our courses that some people are highly motivated and others less so.  That is pretty much the same for most learning modes, but online learning is often seen as less structured in terms of time and space.  Of course, this is one of the key advantages of eLearning, but for the less motivated learner these characteristics amount to fewer disciplines (e.g. “I don’t have to be in class at a particular time”).  As such, disciplines may have to be incorporated through, for instance, the regular completion and submission of assignments.
 
Disengaged and Dissatisfied Learners
In many ways, online learning demands more from the learner than a typical classroom course.  Once again, that presents an excellent opportunity to create a rich learning experience because you are not as dependent on the charisma of the lecturer.  When well-designed, eLearning offers the possibility to create a much higher level of interaction so that learners learn from the material, the facilitator and the experiences of other learners.
 
But if your design depends on this interaction and you have some disengaged or dissatisfied learners, you may have a problem.  In these situations we find that a skilled facilitator can play a key role in keeping the momentum going.  For instance, a facilitator can, to some extent, fill in gaps in the learner participation where learners are disengaged.  But it is also important for the project manager and facilitator to be sensitive to dissatisfaction and responsive to adjusting their approach to learner needs.  Deal with dissatisfaction directly and as quickly as possible.
 
Evaluating Your Efforts
I made the point earlier that learning organizations may value their online programs differently than, say, for-profit organizations.  It doesn’t really matter what metrics you use to evaluate your efforts as long as:
  1. The metrics are meaningful to your learners and/or your management
  2.  You develop valid and timely measurement systems
  3. You allow the facts to tell you what to do differently
Some examples of different types of metrics:
 
Financial metrics: these can be very simple or highly complex depending on who needs them and the managerial decision.  My advice is to keep it simple at first.  Know your fixed and variable costs for program delivery and how much revenue you generate per learner.  You will generally find that eLearning has higher fixed developmental and technical costs than classroom learning but much lower variable costs.
 
Learner satisfaction: it is a good idea to survey the learners both on their expectations of what is important to them and their score on how well you do on those things.  This will allow you to weight the results by the learner’s stated needs or to do a gap analysis.
Internal metrics: it never hurts to ask the people who are designing and delivering your online course how they think it’s going.  You don’t have to be too formal here, but these people often have a unique perspective on what is going well and not so well.
 
Interaction metrics: it is fairly easy to configure an online solution to produce lots of data around the amount of time spent on modules, the level of interaction (e.g. postings), completion rates and the like.   Just make sure you have a way of interpreting this data and understand how these metrics are related to the learners overall experience and the achievement of learning outcomes.
 
In our Certificate in eLearning Management courses we survey our learners twice, mid-course and at the end.  If something is amiss in the mid-course results, we take immediate action to correct it.  We use the end course result to make more fundamental changes and pool this data over time to tell us both how we should be improving our courses and also what other learning we should be offering to satisfy our learners.
 
Any Questions or Comments?
This series has run over the course of four weeks.  A compendium report is available to subscribers.  The report elaborates on the themes covered over the course of the last month and includes an executive summary.  If you are interested in the final compendium report, stay tuned and we'll let you know when it's available for download.
 
We continue to work with learning organizations and are always interested in their views on these issues.  If you have any questions or comments about any of the material in this brief, I would be happy to hear from you at michael@elearncampus.com

Feedback or questions? Email jon@elearncampus.com or call us at (877) 238-3297.
What's New?
Copyright 2008 eLearn Campus Corporation